A new prototype of an electronic jet-ventilator and its humidification system
Background:
Adequate humidification in long-term jet ventilation is a critical
aspect in terms of clinical safety.
Aim:
To assess a prototype of an electronic jet-ventilator and its
humidification system.
Methods:
Forty patients with respiratory insufficiency were randomly
allocated to one of four groups. The criterion for inclusion in this study was
respiratory insufficiency exhibiting a Murray score above 2. The four groups of
patients were ventilated with three different respirators and four different
humidification systems. Patients in groups A and B received superimposed
high-frequency jet ventilation (SHFJV) by an electronic jet-ventilator either
with (group A) or without (group B) an additional humidification system.
Patients in group C received high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) by a
pneumatic high-frequency respirator, using a hot water humidifier for warming
and moistening the inspiration gas. Patients in group D received conventional
mechanical ventilation using a standard intensive care unit respirator with a
standard humidification system. SHFJV and HFPV were used for a period of 100 h
(4days).
Results:
A significantly low inspiration gas temperature was noted in
patients in group B, initially (27.2 ± 2.5°C) and after 2 days
(28.0 ± 1.6°C) (P < 0.05). The percentage of relative
humidity of the inspiration gas in patients in group B was also initially
significantly low (69.8 ± 4.1%; P < 0.05) but rose to an average
of 98 ± 2.8% after 2 h. The average percentage across all four groups
amounted to 98 ± 0.4% after 2 h. Inflammation of the tracheal mucosa was
found in patients in group B and the mucosal injury score (MIS) was
significantly higher than in all the other groups. Patients in groups A, C and
D showed no severe evidence of airway damage, exhibiting adequate values of
relative humidity and temperature of the inspired gas.
Conclusion:
The problems of humidification associated with jet ventilation can
be fully prevented by using this new jet-ventilator. These data were sustained
by nondeteriorating MIS values at the end of the 4-day study period in groups
A, C and D.
Complete Metadata
| @type | dcat:Dataset |
|---|---|
| accessLevel | public |
| bureauCode |
[
"009:25"
]
|
| contactPoint |
{
"fn": "NIH",
"@type": "vcard:Contact",
"hasEmail": "mailto:info@nih.gov"
}
|
| description | Background: Adequate humidification in long-term jet ventilation is a critical aspect in terms of clinical safety. Aim: To assess a prototype of an electronic jet-ventilator and its humidification system. Methods: Forty patients with respiratory insufficiency were randomly allocated to one of four groups. The criterion for inclusion in this study was respiratory insufficiency exhibiting a Murray score above 2. The four groups of patients were ventilated with three different respirators and four different humidification systems. Patients in groups A and B received superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation (SHFJV) by an electronic jet-ventilator either with (group A) or without (group B) an additional humidification system. Patients in group C received high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) by a pneumatic high-frequency respirator, using a hot water humidifier for warming and moistening the inspiration gas. Patients in group D received conventional mechanical ventilation using a standard intensive care unit respirator with a standard humidification system. SHFJV and HFPV were used for a period of 100 h (4days). Results: A significantly low inspiration gas temperature was noted in patients in group B, initially (27.2 ± 2.5°C) and after 2 days (28.0 ± 1.6°C) (P < 0.05). The percentage of relative humidity of the inspiration gas in patients in group B was also initially significantly low (69.8 ± 4.1%; P < 0.05) but rose to an average of 98 ± 2.8% after 2 h. The average percentage across all four groups amounted to 98 ± 0.4% after 2 h. Inflammation of the tracheal mucosa was found in patients in group B and the mucosal injury score (MIS) was significantly higher than in all the other groups. Patients in groups A, C and D showed no severe evidence of airway damage, exhibiting adequate values of relative humidity and temperature of the inspired gas. Conclusion: The problems of humidification associated with jet ventilation can be fully prevented by using this new jet-ventilator. These data were sustained by nondeteriorating MIS values at the end of the 4-day study period in groups A, C and D. |
| distribution |
[
{
"@type": "dcat:Distribution",
"title": "Official Government Data Source",
"mediaType": "text/html",
"description": "Visit the original government dataset for complete information, documentation, and data access.",
"downloadURL": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC29022/"
}
]
|
| identifier | https://healthdata.gov/api/views/88th-e3vj |
| issued | 2025-07-13 |
| keyword |
[
"humidification-systems",
"jet-ventilation",
"mechanical-ventilation",
"nih",
"respiratory-insufficiency"
]
|
| landingPage | https://healthdata.gov/d/88th-e3vj |
| modified | 2025-09-06 |
| programCode |
[
"009:039"
]
|
| publisher |
{
"name": "National Institutes of Health",
"@type": "org:Organization"
}
|
| theme |
[
"NIH"
]
|
| title | A new prototype of an electronic jet-ventilator and its humidification system |