Return to search results
Processed Lab Data for Neural Network-Based Shear Stress Level Prediction
Machine learning can be used to predict fault properties such as shear stress, friction, and time to failure using continuous records of fault zone acoustic emissions. The files are extracted features and labels from lab data (experiment p4679). The features are extracted with a non-overlapping window from the original acoustic data. The first column is the time of the window. The second and third columns are the mean and the variance of the acoustic data in this window, respectively. The 4th-11th column is the the power spectrum density ranging from low to high frequency. And the last column is the corresponding label (shear stress level). The name of the file means which driving velocity the sequence is generated from. Data were generated from laboratory friction experiments conducted with a biaxial shear apparatus. Experiments were conducted in the double direct shear configuration in which two fault zones are sheared between three rigid forcing blocks. Our samples consisted of two 5-mm-thick layers of simulated fault gouge with a nominal contact area of 10 by 10 cm^2. Gouge material consisted of soda-lime glass beads with initial particle size between 105 and 149 micrometers. Prior to shearing, we impose a constant fault normal stress of 2 MPa using a servo-controlled load-feedback mechanism and allow the sample to compact. Once the sample has reached a constant layer thickness, the central block is driven down at constant rate of 10 micrometers per second. In tandem, we collect an AE signal continuously at 4 MHz from a piezoceramic sensor embedded in a steel forcing block about 22 mm from the gouge layer The data from this experiment can be used with the deep learning algorithm to train it for future fault property prediction.
Complete Metadata
| @type | dcat:Dataset |
|---|---|
| accessLevel | public |
| bureauCode |
[
"019:20"
]
|
| contactPoint |
{
"fn": "Duo Cheng",
"@type": "vcard:Contact",
"hasEmail": "mailto:duoc2115@gmail.com"
}
|
| dataQuality |
true
|
| description | Machine learning can be used to predict fault properties such as shear stress, friction, and time to failure using continuous records of fault zone acoustic emissions. The files are extracted features and labels from lab data (experiment p4679). The features are extracted with a non-overlapping window from the original acoustic data. The first column is the time of the window. The second and third columns are the mean and the variance of the acoustic data in this window, respectively. The 4th-11th column is the the power spectrum density ranging from low to high frequency. And the last column is the corresponding label (shear stress level). The name of the file means which driving velocity the sequence is generated from. Data were generated from laboratory friction experiments conducted with a biaxial shear apparatus. Experiments were conducted in the double direct shear configuration in which two fault zones are sheared between three rigid forcing blocks. Our samples consisted of two 5-mm-thick layers of simulated fault gouge with a nominal contact area of 10 by 10 cm^2. Gouge material consisted of soda-lime glass beads with initial particle size between 105 and 149 micrometers. Prior to shearing, we impose a constant fault normal stress of 2 MPa using a servo-controlled load-feedback mechanism and allow the sample to compact. Once the sample has reached a constant layer thickness, the central block is driven down at constant rate of 10 micrometers per second. In tandem, we collect an AE signal continuously at 4 MHz from a piezoceramic sensor embedded in a steel forcing block about 22 mm from the gouge layer The data from this experiment can be used with the deep learning algorithm to train it for future fault property prediction. |
| distribution |
[
{
"@type": "dcat:Distribution",
"title": "Driving Velocity - 12.mat",
"format": "mat",
"accessURL": "https://gdr.openei.org/files/1312/12.mat",
"mediaType": "application/octet-stream",
"description": "A sub-sequence from driving velocity 12. The .mat file can be opened in MATLAB or in Python (needs SciPy to open in Python)."
},
{
"@type": "dcat:Distribution",
"title": "Driving Velocity - 15.mat",
"format": "mat",
"accessURL": "https://gdr.openei.org/files/1312/15.mat",
"mediaType": "application/octet-stream",
"description": "A sub-sequence from driving velocity 15. The .mat file can be opened in MATLAB or in Python (needs SciPy to open in Python)."
},
{
"@type": "dcat:Distribution",
"title": "Driving Velocity - 6.mat",
"format": "mat",
"accessURL": "https://gdr.openei.org/files/1312/6.mat",
"mediaType": "application/octet-stream",
"description": "A sub-sequence from driving velocity 6. The .mat file can be opened in MATLAB or in Python (needs SciPy to open in Python)."
}
]
|
| DOI | 10.15121/1787545 |
| identifier | https://data.openei.org/submissions/7430 |
| issued | 2021-05-14T06:00:00Z |
| keyword |
[
"Biaxial Shear Experiment",
"MATLAB",
"acoustic emissions",
"acoustics",
"ai",
"artificial intelligence",
"biaxial shear apparatus",
"code",
"deep learning",
"energy",
"experiment",
"experimental data",
"fault",
"fault properties",
"friction",
"geophysics",
"geothermal",
"lab data",
"machine learning",
"microseismicity",
"processed data",
"seismic",
"seismic forcasting",
"seismic prediction",
"shear stress",
"time to failure"
]
|
| landingPage | https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1312 |
| license | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| modified | 2021-06-10T15:40:19Z |
| programCode |
[
"019:006"
]
|
| projectLead | Mike Weathers |
| projectNumber | EE0008763 |
| projectTitle | Machine Learning Approaches to Predicting Induced Seismicity and Imaging Geothermal Reservoir Properties |
| publisher |
{
"name": "Pennsylvania State University",
"@type": "org:Organization"
}
|
| spatial |
"{"type":"Polygon","coordinates":[[[-77.861146,40.805544],[-77.861146,40.805544],[-77.861146,40.805544],[-77.861146,40.805544],[-77.861146,40.805544]]]}"
|
| title | Processed Lab Data for Neural Network-Based Shear Stress Level Prediction |
