Return to search results
Use of Adjuncts to Supplement Judicial Resources in Six Jurisdictions, 1983-1986: [United States]
This multi-site data collection evaluates the impact of
judicial adjunct attorneys and referees on the court system at the
county and state levels in six jurisdictions: (1) Pima County, Arizona,
(2) Multnomah County, Oregon, (3) King County, Washington, (4) Hennepin
County, Minnesota, (5) Phoenix, Arizona, and (6) the state of
Connecticut. There are three different units of observation in this
study: (1) civil trial cases, (2) trial judges, including regular
judges and adjunct attorneys, and (3) litigating attorneys. The court
case data include information on type of case, date of trial, type of
judge, type of disposition, and date of disposition. For the
questionnaire data obtained on judges, adjuncts, and litigating
attorneys, information includes experience with the program,
satisfaction, and ideas for changes.
Resources
1 resource available
-
Use of Adjuncts to Supplement Judicial Resources in Six Jurisdictions, 1983-1986: [United States]
FILE
Complete Metadata
| @type | dcat:Dataset |
|---|---|
| accessLevel | public |
| bureauCode |
[
"011:21"
]
|
| contactPoint |
{
"fn": "Open Data Office of Justice Programs (USDOJ)",
"@type": "vcard:Contact",
"hasEmail": "mailto:opendata@usdoj.gov"
}
|
| dataQuality |
false
|
| description | This multi-site data collection evaluates the impact of judicial adjunct attorneys and referees on the court system at the county and state levels in six jurisdictions: (1) Pima County, Arizona, (2) Multnomah County, Oregon, (3) King County, Washington, (4) Hennepin County, Minnesota, (5) Phoenix, Arizona, and (6) the state of Connecticut. There are three different units of observation in this study: (1) civil trial cases, (2) trial judges, including regular judges and adjunct attorneys, and (3) litigating attorneys. The court case data include information on type of case, date of trial, type of judge, type of disposition, and date of disposition. For the questionnaire data obtained on judges, adjuncts, and litigating attorneys, information includes experience with the program, satisfaction, and ideas for changes. |
| distribution |
[
{
"@type": "dcat:Distribution",
"title": "Use of Adjuncts to Supplement Judicial Resources in Six Jurisdictions, 1983-1986: [United States]",
"accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08979.v1"
}
]
|
| identifier |
"3210"
|
| issued | 1989-01-10T00:00:00 |
| keyword |
[
"attorneys",
"court cases",
"disposition (legal)",
"judges",
"judicial process"
]
|
| language |
[
"eng"
]
|
| license | http://www.usa.gov/publicdomain/label/1.0/ |
| modified | 2006-01-12T00:00:00 |
| programCode |
[
"011:060"
]
|
| publisher |
{
"name": "National Institute of Justice",
"@type": "org:Organization",
"subOrganizationOf": {
"id": 22,
"name": "Office of Justice Programs",
"acronym": "OJP",
"parentOrganization": {
"id": 10,
"name": "Department of Justice",
"acronym": "DOJ"
},
"parentOrganizationID": 10
}
}
|
| title | Use of Adjuncts to Supplement Judicial Resources in Six Jurisdictions, 1983-1986: [United States] |
